For instance, artists labored on unique styles for an organization and sold off their house rights to a different company. Musical composers may write a song and offer it to a audio organization which then may hire musicians or an orchestra to execute it. They’re cases for the obtaining party spending money on the consequence of the information worker’s work. There are numerous instances wherever understanding employees are doing an act and receives a commission for. Historically, lawyers give guidance and represent in judge and medical practitioners support people and find approaches to cure them. What’s common in every one of these cases is the fact these settings were mostly concerning personal knowledge individuals working autonomously and, most importantly, the information kept with the data worker. What was sold down or covered were the house rights to a function outcome, such as a sculpture, or perhaps a company, including the representation in court with a lawyer.
In today’s Information Age, nevertheless, there are many more situations where เกร็ดความรู้ personnel conduct such work but the line splitting up the singer and the radio of the job is no longer as clear. In addition, the above mentioned instances display how the benefit of making the knowledge always stayed with the expert and not with the hirer. For example, the attorney may use the data produced by her intensive study and apply it to her next client. Before long she may become a specialist in a specific subject of legislation by offering clients who require guidance in specific subsets of the law. Nobody might expect the lawyer to give up her ownership rights to the knowledge she produced mainly because she was taken care of legal representation.
The situation with the current condition of information employees is that information personnel rarely have a claim or control to the information they created. Being an motivation to perform harder and be more productive, companies should consider a distributed possession constellation with the information worker co-own the knowledge. Many information rigorous agencies are severely ruined when workers leave since the knowledge employees take their knowledge together and the organization doesn’t have way of using it. A legitimate prohibition of understanding individuals to continue utilizing their work thus successfully destroys economic price since knowledge is wasted.
The viewpoint of businesses within their treatment of knowledge created resembles how communist/socialist countries manage inheritance: all price made is normally delivered to the state. The opposite strategy as used in the West is usually accepted to possess encouraged the general public to work harder. Provided ownership in the form of discussed ownership rights to knowledge made between the business and the knowledge worker would therefore inspire to create intellectual capital as well asskills. The co-ownership of understanding might also spur start and share development as a result. Additionally, persons would spend much more and significantly higher perform results when they know they are making capital for themselves along with for the organization.
The situation with the information possession discussing technique is that knowledge-intensive firms give methods with which understanding is created. On one other give, information employees also contribute with their very own methods, as an example with the skills and experiences from the past. In reality, the expense is hence actually distributed because information employees have invested a long time in training and other career making activities for which they are not directly reimbursed. Whilst it holds true that salaries are generally elevated in trade for seniority, higher salaries don’t present the exact same incentives as discussed ownership.